PortfoliosLab logo
^DJUSFN vs. IWB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ^DJUSFN and IWB is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

^DJUSFN vs. IWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (^DJUSFN) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

^DJUSFN:

1.16

IWB:

0.73

Sortino Ratio

^DJUSFN:

1.71

IWB:

1.04

Omega Ratio

^DJUSFN:

1.26

IWB:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

^DJUSFN:

1.49

IWB:

0.68

Martin Ratio

^DJUSFN:

5.73

IWB:

2.54

Ulcer Index

^DJUSFN:

4.13%

IWB:

5.09%

Daily Std Dev

^DJUSFN:

19.60%

IWB:

19.80%

Max Drawdown

^DJUSFN:

-80.50%

IWB:

-55.38%

Current Drawdown

^DJUSFN:

-2.17%

IWB:

-3.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^DJUSFN achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly higher than IWB's 0.86% return. Over the past 10 years, ^DJUSFN has underperformed IWB with an annualized return of 9.01%, while IWB has yielded a comparatively higher 12.41% annualized return.


^DJUSFN

YTD

5.02%

1M

4.37%

6M

-1.56%

1Y

22.68%

3Y*

11.46%

5Y*

14.42%

10Y*

9.01%

IWB

YTD

0.86%

1M

6.37%

6M

-1.98%

1Y

14.37%

3Y*

14.08%

5Y*

15.53%

10Y*

12.41%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index

iShares Russell 1000 ETF

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

^DJUSFN vs. IWB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^DJUSFN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^DJUSFN is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^DJUSFN is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^DJUSFN is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^DJUSFN is 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^DJUSFN is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^DJUSFN is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

IWB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWB is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWB is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWB is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWB is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWB is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWB is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

^DJUSFN vs. IWB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (^DJUSFN) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ^DJUSFN Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the IWB Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^DJUSFN and IWB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Drawdowns

^DJUSFN vs. IWB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^DJUSFN drawdown since its inception was -80.50%, which is greater than IWB's maximum drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^DJUSFN and IWB.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

^DJUSFN vs. IWB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (^DJUSFN) is 4.53%, while iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that ^DJUSFN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...